General News

You can now text to 911 in an emergency


Location Finder for Windows Phone 8 updated, adds shortened URLs for sharing

Windows Phone News

AMBER Alerts on your Windows Phone: What they are and how to manage them

Windows Phone News

CoPilot to unveil new Windows Phone features at MWC, also coming to Windows tablets


Waze gets directions, finds a new home on Windows Phone and is now available


Jack of Tools Pro available for free on Windows Phone over the next 24 hours


I'm Here: Share your location fast and seamlessly with this modern Windows Phone 8 app

Windows Phone News

CoPilot navigation announced for Windows Phone 8 and Windows 8


Find buried treasure with Geocaching Live for Windows Phone


Microsoft's HelpBridge Windows Phone app: Connecting friends, family and resources in times of emergency


Get help with the Windows Phone 8 app Tap for HELP!

Windows Phone News

Cloud-focused GPS chip by Microsoft Research slashes smartphone battery consumption


What is the dot in a circle icon on my Windows Phone?


Track My Life updated, time machine feature added


Nokia announces Drive 3.0 going live soon on Windows Phone [Now Live]


gMaps Pro updated for Windows Phone, StreetView improved

Windows Phone News

Some users complaining of Nokia Lumia 900 "Akron, Ohio GPS bug" [Updated]


Don't have a Nokia Windows Phone but want Augmented Reality? Try Wikitude.


Amazing Weather v3.0 with new themes is now available for download on Windows Phone


GPS Calculator updated, adds sharing and a new altimeter

< >

9 of 10 emergency wireless calls lack accurate location data in D.C. area

9 of 10 emergency wireless calls lack accurate location data in D.C. area

Don't cut the cord just yet on your home phones! FCC data reveals that 9 out of 10 emergency calls made with a cell phone in Washington, D.C. lack accurate location information, making it harder for emergency workers to respond in a crisis. The data was collected in the first half of 2013 and only covers the D.C. area in the U.S.

Through the Freedom of Information Act, public interest group Find Me 911 reported:

According to data filed with the FCC by the D.C. Office of Unified Communications last fall, just 10.3% of the wireless calls made to the District's 9-1-1 communications center from December 2012 to July 2013 included the latitude-longitude (or "Phase II" location) needed to find a caller. Of the 385,341 wireless calls made over that period, just 39,805 had that "Phase II" information, while the remaining "Phase I" calls only showed the nearest cell tower, an area too broad to be useful for emergency responders.

The report cites that Verizon and Sprint were able to deliver location accurately on about 24 percent of calls each while GSM providers like T-Mobile and AT&T fared worse with 3.2% and 2.6% accuracy respectively.

This is especially alarming given that many households have given up on a landline and rely solely on their cellphones for voice communications.

The agency says that up to 10,000 additional lives could be saved with better location information, which would help reduce emergency response times. The FCC already is proposing a new rule that would address this issue, which would make it far more accurate than the A-GPS system used by most phones and carriers. A-GPS requires a direct line of sight to satellites to report location, which means it could fail in buildings and dense urban environments.

The FCC's new proposal is being endorsed by many emergency services associations, including those that represent police chiefs, sheriffs, firefighters, EMS, EMTs, and others.

Source: Find Me 911



There are 21 comments. Sign in to comment

DKXKnight says:

Whatever happened to just telling them where you are?

What happens if you can't talk, for example if you are kidnapped and near the kidnappers, you don't want to talk, just have them find your location.

Bob101910 says:

Or if your cat is sleeping on your chest and you don't want to wake him up

From personal experience:
Called 911 with abusive step dad, I just called 911 I left it on for them to hear everything. I had to be sneaky, I couldn't hold phone to talk. Within minutes I was so relieved to hear those hard knocks/banging on the door. I can almost assure you people who are younger like 6 years may go through the same. They may not know the street or full address. I feel more sad than disappointed that maybe others can't be found.

MikeSo says:

I'm sorry about your experience. Hope the call helped. That is certainly a good example.

Thats why sprint probably uses gps

SeraphX2 says:

Umm, lots of people turn of Location Services in the GPS of saving battery power. The question is, are the phones setup to ignore this setting when it is in an emergency call. This may have nothing to do with the carrier or the phone manufacturer.

FFugue says:

I can't wait for the day they'll have a 911 app where you can place a call directly to 911 with the press of a button, that would automatically connect you to someone who would have access to your GPS and last known locations on your phone and that would have access to your camera and microphone that way if you're in a situation where you can't talk they can see exactly what's going on.

Cyrax.NET says:

Also useful for agencies wishing to track you..and with your suggestions listen in and watch you too. Only difference will be its listening and watching all the time. BUT the app is there for your benefit. You asked for them to have those powers. To protect you when you need them < 1% of your lifetime.

MikeSo says:

Just keep your tinfoil hat on and you'll be ok.

herbertsnow says:

Break out the foil baby.

I'm going to look into developing that...
(Dev of Atmosphere weather)

hagjohn says:

My house was robbed 3 weeks ago. My 911 call did not go to the right place. AT&T.

AlwaysHedged says:

Proper set up of 911 location data is the responsibility of the subscriber, not AT&T.  The same is true for VOIP lines.

Sebbs128 says:

The service provider (aka carrier, AT&T etc) is responsible for sending data about the call to the emergency services agency's call centre, whether it's landline or cellular. In "Phase I" it's typically just the service address (the street address the landline is registered to, or in the case of mobile phones, typically the billing address), though sometimes (depending on equipment) they can send the cell tower nearest to the caller's location. Phase II data must again come from the service provider, but can provide more specific mobile location details (a point, or an area defined by a polygon or arc) if it can be determined (again, the right equipment is required for this). The receiving agency also needs the software in their call taking environment to be able to use the Phase II data and attach it to the call taking screen the calltaker uses; not all agencies (especially smaller agencies, who have very limited budgets) will have updated software to do that.

tl;dr: the call information can only be provided by the service provider, as they're the one connecting the call to the greater phone network

Did I miss something? The article misses how this new rule FCC is proposing and being endorsed by others would make this more accurate? What is the means to make this more accurate?

My phone always tells me I'm 10 miles south. I'm in the DC area.

xFalk says:

Haven't had a landline in over 15 years. While scary at decision ever.

Whoa! A 520 after a long time!

Just call them and say there are a bunch of dogs to shoot. They'll be there in 5 minutes

At least in Chile works good one time called to the fire department for a emergency but was many years ago and my old phone company Entel PCS just gave the location of the place where was calling and could come to see what happened,a house was set in flames, now don't know if works so good as should.