More metal

HTC One (M8) for Windows will make its way to AT&T

HTC One M8 for Windows video clip

HTC One M8 for Windows video from Verizon Wireless

Exclusive leak

HTC One M8 Windows Phone store display leaked

Loophole to close?

Verizon could be closing a unlimited data loophole

New phone alert

Blind your friends with a neon green Lumia 1520 (AT&T)

New phone alert

All green Lumia 1520 now available from AT&T

Windows Phone News

AT&T's Lumia 1520 is now getting the Windows Phone 8.1 update

General News

Strong subscriber growth powers AT&T's Q2 2014 earnings

Rumors

AT&T may rollout Windows Phone 8.1 update 'as early as this week'

Windows Phone News

AT&T Nokia Lumia 635 arrives on July 25 for $99 as prepaid GoPhone

General News

Ballmer's dreams of the Los Angeles Clippys on hold as Sterling prepares NBA lawsuit

General News

AT&T acquiring DirectTV

General News

AT&T relaunches Cricket as nationwide brand with new smartphones, plans, and LTE

How To

Here’s how to get Qi wireless charging back on your AT&T Nokia Lumia 1520

Windows Phone News

Nokia Lumia 520 available for $50 at Best Buy, today only

Windows Phone News

Nokia Lumia 635 and Windows Phone 8.1 coming to AT&T, T-Mobile, MetroPCS

Windows Phone News

New firmware update rolling out for the Lumia 1520 on AT&T

Surface

Exclusive - Surface 2 with LTE for AT&T priced at $679 for 64 GB, new photos show stock

Rumors

Surface 2 with LTE arrives at Microsoft Stores for impending launch

General News

AT&T lights up LTE in 12 markets across the nation, brings 4G to coverage to 300,000 more

10

AT&T dissin' Verizon and gets sued

Verizon has filed suit against AT&T asking a U.S. District Court in Manhattan to rule that Verizon's claims to be "America's Most Reliable 3G Network", "America's Best 3G Network" and "America's Most Reliable Wireless Network" are truthful.  As if our Court System doesn't have enough to sort out.

Verizon took offense when AT&T called the claim "misleading", "false" and could not be supported. According to Verizon, "AT&T's challenge relies on the premise that speed is an essential element of the standard for measuring network reliability."  As if we don't need speed on out networks?

Mark Siegel, an AT&T spokesman stated that "Verizon's claim that speed is not a relevant factor to a reliable 3G network is preposterous. Data network speed is an essential factor to consumers when it comes to data transmission on their wireless devices. The 3G reliability claims made in ads by Verizon Wireless are false and misleading."

As silly as it sounds, if Verizon should win this suit, they will have Court affirmation that they have "America's Most Reliable 3G Network".  I wonder what Sprint will have to say about that?

This reminds us of Apple's latest battle with Microsoft over the "Laptop Hunter" ads Microsoft is currently running.  The original ad named Apple specifically with statements such as "This Mac is $2000 and that's before adding anything.".  After complaints from Apple, Microsoft voluntarily changed the wording to "It seems your paying a lot for the brand."  All this makes you wonder how other competitors have survived the "ad war" without suing one another.

For those sitting on the edge of their seats on this one, the case cite is Verizon Wireless v. AT&T Mobility LLC filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, case number 2009-6656.  Personally, I think this might be better suited for Judge Joe Brown instead.

[Read: Reuters.com]

0
loading...
0
loading...
0
loading...
0
loading...

Comments

There are 10 comments. Sign in to comment

says:

I with Verizon on this one, I don't go around saying my car is reliable becuase it is fast, my car is reliable becuase it starts up and gets me to point A to B. In Verizon case be able to make a phone call.

says:

I wonder how either of these companies can make those claims or anything even close to those claims. So much is dependent on the location in which the phone is being used. Even with the coverage maps that cell phone companies provide, I find that these although somewhat acurate aren't perfect. In my opinion both these companies while offering various phone choices have offered poor plans that aren't competitive in what they have to offer.

says:

While I think this is a complete was of the court's time - AT&T has no leg to stand on in the argument anyway. Their data network (Denver) is extremely slow most times and even with 5 bars I'm only getting 448kbps down / 203 kbps up. Calls drop very often, and their little claim to more bars in more places must be referring to actual drinking bars, because they sure as heck aren't signal bars.

says:

I have had ATT&T before switching to Verizon.
I find that Verizon has over better coverage and data network.

ATT&T has less coverage but the call is able to be kept.

If i had to choose between no coverage area and having dropped calls i would choose coverage every time


This is my own opinion and thoughts but I think Verizon has the evidence but what does ATT&T have to back it up?

karelj says:

It's amazing that AT&T would pick this fight.

"Data network speed is an essential factor to consumers when it comes to data transmission on their wireless devices. The 3G reliability claims made in ads by Verizon Wireless are false and misleading."

AT&T's 3g speeds are horrible and their shoddy network coverage even in major cities like NY is well documented.
To call out a competitor on the issue of speed as a benchmark is the height of chutzpah.

Pony99CA says:

As was pointed out, speed and reliability aren't the same. I suppose a slow network could get clogged up and become unreliable in those circumstances, but that would be part of the reliability measuring.

However, speed certainly would be a factor in claiming your network was "the best".

I think this should be handled by the Federal Trade Commission, not a court. Issues of reliability, while varying locally, can be averaged out over a large area. I would think the FTC would be better equipped to handle those claims than any court would.

Steve

says:

Sprint is the most reliable and fastest 3G Network with the most coverage. I drove my MDX from NYC to California to Florida and back to NYC, and I was using my laptop with sprint broadband and it was freaking sweet.....speedyyyyyy.oh yeah my fried was using his at&t and that thing was like dialup 1400bps lol or slower I swear.

Check out PC World 3G comparison test and they are a few others, and all see sprint as the winner.
http://newsreleases.sprint.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=127149&p=irol-newsArticle...

says:

shouldn't at&t be thankful that they haven't went bankrupt in this horrible economy.

Verizon is way more reliable in my opinion. with at&t i couldn't even get 3g in certain parts of my house. with verizon i get signal in my basement =)

Verizon ftw!!

says:

Verizon makes most reliable claim best on Test Men driving over 1 Million miles a year. They drive vans equiped with all carrier devices that automatically make and log calls/receive data. Results are validated by 3rd party.

at&t stands no chance in this suit.

On another note, someone should take at&t to court for claiming they have "the best coverage worldwide." Verizon has just as many voice and data locations as at&t now. So what makes at&t, the "best coverage." If I were at&t,I would not be bringing attention to false advertising claims (like when they were forced to drop their "fewest dropped calls" campaign)

says:

I hope the judge in this suits moves the case from the courthouse to my living room. Oh yeah, thats right, neither A t & T nor Verizon work in my house.