AT&T lights up LTE in 12 markets across the nation, brings 4G to coverage to 300,000 more

AT&T lights up LTE in 12 markets across the nation, brings 4G to coverage to 300,000 more

The build-outs of the LTE networks of AT&T and Verizon in the United States have hit the point where they're covering smaller cities in 4G radio signals. In fact, just today Ma Bell announced that they're flipping the switch to turn on AT&T LTE coverage in 12 municipalities around the United States, though the largest in this batch is Bismark, North Dakota, population: 65,000. There used to be a time when a single new LTE network meant millions were covered — now it takes a dozen new markets to cover a mere 300,000. We're on the long tail of the LTE coverage build-out now. The full list of new AT&T LTE coverage follows.

  • Anderson, Indiana
  • Deridder, Louisiana
  • Midland, Michigan
  • Lebanon, Missouri
  • Claremont, New Hampshire
  • Lumberton, North Carolina
  • Bismark, North Dakota
  • Bellefontaine, Ohio
  • Defiance, Ohio
  • Greenwood, South Carolina
  • Seneca, South Carolina
  • Gainesville, Texas

If you're seeing AT&T LTE for the first time in your home town, let us know in the comments.



There are 41 comments. Sign in to comment

No India lol, but...
Seems Faster :P

jholso says:

Woot now when I vist my friends in Claremont Ill actually have service, its been spotty on that edge of the state for years

dqgeek says:

Don't live in DeRidder, LA, but not very far from it. It will be nice when we go there to eat occasionally to have the faster service available.

LTE what is that??? Here at Panama city, we use 3G at 512Kbps or 1Mbps. Hate this speed advertised as 4G.

cruelvaldez says:

And this is related to windows phone how?

Agent-P says:

Maybe because are lte capable Windows Phones on AT&T. I really hope for your sake that question was a joke. Otherwise I'll have lost even more faith in the human race.

sholokov says:

Maybe we should get news about plastics too as WPs are made from plastics as well.

ncxcstud says:

if it pertains to how much future handsets might cost (whether decreased or increased in price) or about a new way in how they implement it that is beneficial to future handsets, then I hope they do write an article about it...

StuBeck says:

Jeez, people get pissy about the littlest things!

kc77 says:

I'd be fine with that. It would let me keep up with schoolwork all while looking at WPC. Start reporting on plastics! :P

sholokov says:

Thank you... WPC has lost the document that had their mission statement written on it.

Tips_y says:

I'll be going to Gainsville for several days and I'll be bringing my LTE-capable AT&T WP so good to know they now have AT&T LTE over there. Thumbs-up WPC for reporting it!

rianext says:

Don't read it if you dont want to...there are others who are interested in stuff related to how their phones perform...internet after all is what makes the most of these phones...this is for those who who would like to know their options through such tit bits...
If you're expecting every article to be tailored for your interests you're sadly mistaken...

In the USA minority of WP are on ar&t.

Jack Larson1 says:

Hmm. Can you confirm that? TMo has only a few, as well as VRZ. Seems unlikely, especially with all of the complaints launched at att when the amber update shipped.

Tips_y says:

You don't say! But even so, those "minority" users would still be interested in this news so good for WPC to cover it.

scdkad says:

Supposed you live in one of these areas and had been complaining about the lack of LTE and how bad ATT sucks etc etc

sectime says:

Glad for those who got it but this sounds like Sprint's PR releases about small towns.

terrokkinit says:

Don't we just love PR? ;)

Tips_y says:

If they have already covered most big towns, shouldn't they now be moving into smaller towns? I don't get what's bad about the news just because those in the report are smaller towns.

sectime says:

Sensorly maps are a good place to look to the difference in coverage. Zoom out on 4G and toggle between the major carriers.  

paulxxwall says:

Was up in benzonia Michigan and my family had at least 4bars of lte not bad at all last year ....barely 3 bars of 4g ...not bad att

terrokkinit says:

All I will say is Verizon's LTE is everywhere. :) and with my soon-to-be Lumia Icon, I think my cellular utopia will be complete. :) (Yes, I used "utopia"...hehe)

Munkeyphyst says:

Meanwhile, I constantly lose my ATT signal as I sit in my house 35 miles from downtown Chicago, Il

Fitz35 says:

Goshen, IN.  The coverage map still shows 4G but my Lumia 920 is showing LTE this morning.

atkichr says:

Got lte on my s4 today, been getting it off and on in elkhart Dunlop and goshen since Monday

Posted via the WPC App for Android!

RyanKennedy says:

Did anyone else notice that the phone in the title picture is running T-Mobile?

ScottAB says:

It's actually AT&T-Mobile.

dbgman says:

We got lte in January in Palmdale,ca....two years after Verizon had turned on lte

jmshub says:

I never saw an announcement for it, but LTE was recently activated near me. Night and day difference, especially since the 3G was oversubscribed in the area and very slow.

hunter49686 says:

Traverse City, MI we picked up LTE a week or so ago...love it

who has better coverage att or tmobile with both of their new data plans that are off contract they are a fraction of the price of verizon and i am thinking about switching. which one should i go for att or tmobile i have family that lives all over

Chi28n2k says:

AT&T coverage is universal, compared to T-Mob... Having said that, if you're in urban areas, you're probably covered pretty well, by AT&T, but rural coverage is still hit or miss. But its absolutely non-existent, with T-Mobile.

thank you for your help, does att have good indoor/ building service my friends on tmobile complain about that in ny

does att have good service while indoors some of my friends complain about that in tmobile?

by the way thank you very much for helping me

MikeSo says:

When I was on AT&T I never cared that I didn't have LTE. What is the point anyway with the measly data allowance you get? Once I got it, I still had to keep an eye on the data I used, to make sure I didn't go over. In reality, there was no difference in my usage before and after LTE, and no difference in the level of enjoyment I got out of it. Woohoo, a song can be downloaded slightly faster?

I have T-Mobile now with their "4G" but unlimited data. Much more useful. I can watch Netflix, listen to streaming radio, etc without worry.

Dean87229 says:

Just got it today in South Haven, Michigan.

MikadoWu says:

I would just like to say Good Job ATT.

I was Scuba Diving about 20 miles of the shore or Clearwater Beach this weekend and still had 3 bars and LTE.  Nokia 920 put me right on top my dive site, Actually too close.

St LEGEND says:

I don't understand this announcement for Midland, Michigan. I live here and I've had 4G since I bought my 920 which is almost a year so i don't get this at all.