all of the apps

Windows Phone Store passes 300,000 app milestone


Tweetium beta now available for existing owners on Windows Phone 8.1

Microsoft News

Microsoft's planned surprise today was indeed another Android smartphone dubbed Nokia X2

Microsoft News

Microsoft's secret list of Android patents revealed by Chinese government

Microsoft News

Apple, Cisco join Microsoft in the fight against US government requesting overseas data

Windows Phone News

Watch the full response as to why Microsoft is considering Cortana for iOS and Android


Hilton HHonors app makes booking your stay even easier


7-Eleven drops Windows Phone support

Microsoft News

Touch-friendly version of Office reportedly headed to Android before Windows 8

General News

Follow all the happenings from WWDC 2014 live with iMore!


Hot out of the oven, Pizza Hut app update addresses nagging bugs


Vector 41: Mergers and accusations

General News

Ari Partinen, senior Nokia Pureview camera engineer, headed to Apple

Microsoft News

Motorola Solutions (the other Motorola) signs licensing agreement with Microsoft

General News

Apple and Microsoft team up to slow patent reform

General News

Microsoft gets decent clean energy marks from Greenpeace

Windows 8 Apps+Games

Top Reddit apps for Windows 8, the narwhal bacons at midnight

Microsoft News

Microsoft and Dell enter new patent deal for Xbox, Android and Chrome

General News

Inspired by Microsoft, Apple applies for a Surface-style keyboard patent


HTC rumored to be building a Windows Phone version of the new Android flagship

< >

Beating Apple's exclusivity: How Microsoft caters to developers while Google does not

Recently, in a jocular back and forth between Matthew Mller (ZDNet), myself and Chad Garrett of TiPB, Chad suggested that we're enjoying just old ports of iPhone games and therefore nothing special when it comes to things like Assassin's Creed.

But after reading John Gruber's excellent article on Where Are the Android Killer Apps? I realized that Microsoft has done something that Google/Android have not: taken away Apple's exclusivity on various games and killer apps. Sure, we don't have nearly as many and are still lacking some big ones, but isn't that just a matter of time? Here's Gruber's quote on the matter which sums it up perfectly:

A final thought, regarding Android’s relative weakness as a software platform. iOS’s exclusivity for a bunch of big-name mobile games — Need for Speed Undercover, Star Wars: Battle for Hoth, Monopoly, Tetris, The Sims, Assassin’s Creed — has been broken. Not by Android, where none of these games exist, but by Windows Phone 7, a one-month-old platform.

That really is huge. Why, despite how popular Android is, have they failed to get many big titles? Why no killer, exclusive apps, except the closely held "Google experience" ones (e.g. Gmail, Google Talk)? We already know about why there's no Netflix (poor security, fragmentation).

Of course we know the answer: Microsoft puts a lot of emphasis on courting developers, even throwing money at them to cover the cost of development. Sure it's brash, perhaps uncouth but it works. Remember, this about the ends (consumer experience) not so much the means (save it for you business ethics class). Fact is, at this pace, Microsoft and Windows Phone 7 will have more quality big-name offerings than Android, who's big sellers instead tend to be ones that modify or fix the OS.

Sounds a lot like our old Windows Mobile, aka the past.

So yes, Apple, we'll take your ports and exclusives and any apps that make your platform "unique"--you'll loose that  and a reason for people to choose your product over Windows Phone 7.



There are 10 comments. Sign in to comment

zbend says:

I'm primarily a Microsoft Developer, and I've never received any money from Microsoft, but I do thank them for a development environment and tool set that doesn't make me want to bash my head into the concrete (see Android\java's eclipse, and iphones Xcode). I don't consider it 'brash, perhaps uncouth' to not want your developers lives to be hell, but I'd also take any money.

alijahg34 says:

Shouldn't the title be Baiting


Nice try, but no. Unlike actual baiting, like yours, the article makes a good point: apps that used to be exclusively available on iPOS are becoming available on the only recently debuted WP7 while still taking a while, if at all, on the 2-year-old and more popular Android. Despite all the fear and hate leading to and after the release of WP7, it's becoming clearer that MS made the correct decision in starting anew, rather than continuing on the path it was on.

Strangis says:

Not really, because Android is a PITA to develop for, especially when it comes to more intensive stuff like games. Though just doing the graphics for a game, the programmer I'm working with, who was an early Android adopter, is sick of it from that perspective.

The first day I purchased my evo I thought where are the movie apps and where are the games? I'm so glad I have a wp7 device!!!!!

anantou says:

The problem is that Microsoft made the bad decision to keep the "windows" name in the new OS. If u ask 10 people which OS is more modern Android or WP7, 9 of them will answer Android (which is of course not true)

aggreyj says:

This article is incorrect as far as WP7 being the platform to break the exclusivity. A lot of those games you mentioned came out on the webOS platform months ago; some of them at the beginning of this year. I haven't had my Palm Pre for a few months now so I haven't kept track but I know that at least Need for Speed, Tetris, Monopoly, and The Sims were all on webOS.

Fair enough on the games but it misses the large point of Gruber's article which we can now ask about PalmOS: Where are the killer PalmOS apps? Because I don't see any and certainly the buying public doesn't know either.

Yamishi says:

Shouldn't it say "lose" rather than "loose"?/grammarnazi

HD7guy says:

Rereading after following a link from Parachute Panic ( response to the idea that Microsoft is being a bit on the shady side for paying developers to create games, I'm calling BS. How is this any different from any company hiring contractors? In some cases the company outright owns the fruits of the contractors' labors; in others the contractors' own the rights. I've been in both situations, and both are far from shady.