Nokia Lumia Catwalk

First images of Nokia’s aluminum Lumia, codenamed ‘Catwalk’, have surfaced [Updated]

We have no way of verifying the authenticity of these two images, but it appears to be of the upcoming Nokia Lumia ‘Catwalk’, a follow up to the Lumia 920 that reportedly sports a new aluminum chassis to help reduce the size and weight. The images showed up on the popular Chinese social network Sina Weibo.

No other details were given, but earlier information about Catwalk stated the device as having 4.5” display with an OCTA display, S4 1.5GHz dual-core CPU, 16GB of storage (down from 32GB), 2000mAh battery and an 8.7MP OIS camera with LED flash.

Nokia Lumia Catwalk

As a result of the new body, the device is 50 grams lighter (just 132g) than the current Lumia 920 and is supposedly about 2.3mm less in thickness (8.4 versus 10.7mm on the 920).

From the image, we can see that the microSIM door on top matches the Lumia 720's and indeed, it has the same "three dots" on the back for a wireless charging backplate. While moving the microUSB (or is it an HDMI out port?) to the top may seem unusual, we must remember that it is not a requirement that it be on the bottom of the device and OEMs can move things around.

The timing of the device was reported to be for a May 15th announcement with a late June availability. T-Mobile US is expected to pick up the device as well as other international carriers.

Verizon will launch a similar, but non-aluminum device called the Lumia 928 aka ‘Laser’ in the coming weeks.

Update (5:25PM ET): We have spoken to someone familiar with this alleged device who can confirm that it is indeed, accurate. Because of that we've bumped the rum'o'meter from an initial '5' to an '8' (from an early corroboration) to a '10', meaning we have very high confidence in these images. Whether or not they are early or late prototype, we don't know.

Source: Sina Weibo, Baidu; Thanks,  AIKON, for the tip!



There are 327 comments. Sign in to comment

walter1832 says:

That's what she said.

Flagz says:

Glad you believe it then!

kiddori says:

Fugly!  ....and yes, it would be a step back.

walter1832 says:

That's what she said.

rodneyej says:

I just don't see any Nokia design language in this device.. Or very little.. It looks more like a Huawei device. I'm very skeptical if this is production hardware....

dynamic_cast says:

I love Lumia 920. But it is heavy. It fell on the floor and caused a damage on the hardwood. I cannot tell which corner if the phone did it. Now I understand why it is called a weapon

Lanceloni says:

I really doubt the production run will be gray. All the naysayers here will be commenting on how awesome it looks when WPCentral shows pics of them in the lumia colors

Bilal_Fakih says:

Ugly, especially from the back! Nokia come on!! lets hope its all fake 

mrcraggle says:

Really don't like the look of this. It just looks so standard and the USB and USB ports make the top look too busy. The back is also hideous. The camera looks more like the back of a HTC than something from Nokia.

namikral says:

god no, this looks very cheap from the back and too ugly....

as147 says:

So is the small plastic strip in the top corner a long awaited LED for missed calls?
Love my 920 but if this thing is thinner, lighter with a better camera, still has wireless charging, has the USB port at the bottom and an LED for missed calls it will be very popular. I am sure the pictures are an early prototype and it will be improved before it comes out.

This cant be right. Looks like the back of an old htc and the corners and ports look like a 3G iphone. I

DJCBS says:

Well, whoever designed this should be fired. This is positively one of the ugliest Lumias ever designed But it fits if it's to be the 41MP Lumia to succeed the 808. 'cause the 808 was also a damn ugly phone.
And the aluminium body just makes it look cheap.

Just...just awful. I'll stick with the polycarbonate ones. Thanks.

Rndomuser says:

Looks like an early prototype or a "fake" model from a nameless Asian manufacturer... I highly doubt that final product will look similarly.

blackprince says:

What's an OCTA display? And why should I be exicted about it?

awneze says:

read a good explanation what those 3 cirles at the bottom is for! here:

textomatic says:

I wan't the 920 specs but in the size of an 820 body.  I want removable back covers!

benrp says:

Unless they fix that back up and include wireless charging I'll be waiting for EOS.

dazr87 says:

Eww what an ugly looking phone. I think ill stick with my yellow 920!

nanoware says:

Is this is an older proto. Newer revision to have Xenon flash?

socialproof says:

Simply put...its fricken ugly as Hell. Looks like a copy of everybody elses design (HTC). Nokia would never, and if they do...what else is left to brag about to others?! WP8 OS is still a bit iffy, Nokia is the only edge I have on others. Ugh.

Kill me now

echoshizzle says:

I like it. Don't think it's nearly as bad as people are saying. I would have prefferred an N8 bump with xenon flash, though.

hutzero says:

Look like that is "EOS"  with 41MP camera(may be).
Because size of camera too big for 8.7MP.

Not feeling it, but will hold judgment till it's confirmed.

Fndlumia says:

That's is definitely an HDMI port

erzhik says:

This is fake. Too much like a Huawei W1.

hary536 says:

On an unrelated note, 
why does "Kim Kardashian's skirt causes outrage" link is among the links in "More from WPCentral"? 

Memristor says:

One of the best features of the Lumia phones is the polycarbonate case. I don't care if the phone weights 30g more than an aluminum phone. I rather have phone that can withstand the occacional drop instead of a ligther device that scratches and dends.

The photo is true, I have comfirmed the original poster.

uopjo6 says:

To differentiate with the current Lumia color palettes it could only go monotone. Or maybe they will polish it with color....hard to say, but what I really want to say is you can't tell if it's a phone from Nokia judging from the back alone. Kind of a step backwards.

What I liked about the Lumia phones were that you can tell apart they are Nokia's design with clean lines and a ceramic plate aroud the lens. A slight bump around the lens reminds me of Samsung, and Samsung makes me sick. 

Looks like my 920 will still be a signature phone for a while :)

cowboy620 says:

Why use docking when we have Bluetooth and a JBL powerup speaker who needs docking!

Mario Torres says:

We needs a Nokia like HTC M7!!!

YianniGR says:

Can the hole for the tool to eject the sim tray be in the middle of it as it is here?! And what's that on the upper right side of the phone, led for notifications? I don't think this is the real thing!

Metro1088 says:

I'm getting this no matter what!

b23h says:

Early prototype as the back looks either plastic or just ugly.   So either Nokia's industrial design is poor, or it is an early prototype.   Also, would like to see the three spot charging disappear for the production model.

vlad0 says:

Nokia logo in the middle... now we are getting somewhere.

flemo1974 says:

usb on top would be a dealbreaker for me.

adi_555 says:

I think its a prototype or fake, its not having a Xenon flash like on Lumia 928 for verizon as the leak suggest.
No pureview and Carl zeiss branding.
Volume rocker and power buttons are way below normal placements in earlier Lumias. There is much less space to have physical camera button.

kullkid92x says:

Please PLEASE let this have the S4 Pro 8960T that one is also dual core but 1.7gh and most important, the newer 320 Adreno gpu.

Padr1n0 says:

Doesnt scream Lumia to me. Maybe its the bland "silver" color. Let me see some Cyan or Anodized Red, Blue, etc.

Sean D. says:

C'mon T-Mobile, don't shit on my hopes and dreams again! 

DaSchnee says:

One can only hope that this is a prototype... So safe this they should raise the back so that it is flush with the camera lens. Now they have room for wireless charging and maybe a bigger battery.

Thank god this looks ugly and has very little over the 920, otherwise I would have been regretting my 920 purchase, I would have been very jealous if the other set of specs were true, 1080p, quad core, 2GB RAM 41MP camera etc

Man that thing looks ugly. Wow.

Gigantuouse says:

I ran the rumor in detail by my source. My source looked around the room for a little bit, maybe she was a little uncomfortable with me knowing so much about an unannounced prouduct. She started shifting a little bit, she was definately nervous. Then I pulled out the picture you guys have here and asked for a comment. She wouldn't make eye contact with me but she did say "Meow" and ran into her scratch post's hiding area.
Rumor confirmed.

dukrem says:

At least the wireless charging plate should make the camera flush with the body. And if they come in different colours i think that will look quite nice, especially blue or yellow combined with that aluminium frame.

Chef316 says:

Woohoo! Crossing by fingers that I will be able to get one of these on Tmo US in September when I'm due for an upgrade!!! I assume it will also be running the newest version of WP and the latest firmware???

gcdc_lumia says:

i hope the back would be arch-like (for lack of a better wrd)... same with the current 920.... much tolerable than that hideous image

Fuhrer D says:

Charging port on the  top makes sense with a WP. Easier to use while it is connected.

eortizr says:

No Xenon Flash?  Not worthy....

I dont know why, but i am hating its look from back due to that camera. Though phone is premium but that camera gives it similar looks of cheap canvas Phones by Micromax!!!
I wish its just a prototype and will either come with looks of N8 or traditional Lumias. But this, Nooooo!
Else looks quite nice, and yeh, nokia is back with a bang........

Rishicash says:

I sure hope it doesn't look like this. Not the camera bulge, not the shape, not the finish. This looks like it's been beaten badly with an ugly stick!

vladi says:

With camera bulge on the back they alienated those who don't care about the camera really. To me awesome camera is not on a list of pros and cons when I am choosing the phone so emphasizing it just throws me off. Well it also might explain how were they able to shave few mils in thickness and why 920 is so thick.
This design language is more of a continuation of 810 on Tmobile then of any other Lumia so who knows maybe we are looking at TMo exclusive here ;)
To me biggest drawback in design is the loss of curved glass cause thats is what makes Nokia Nokia

Mira7 says:

That camera bump is a huge mistake... i´m glad i haven´t wait  for something like this (even it´s just a preproduction model) and got the 920, seems like a last device with the beautiful original lumia designed body...

rmichael75 says:

The more you look at the back, it grows on you.. it seems ok today .. but it was very ugly y'day.

fieldeffect says:

I *really* hope that this is either a very early prototype, or that the grey on the back is not intended to be the actual back of the phone (i.e. that maybe there is an additional very thin shell that goes on top which is metal like the edges.
As it stands this just looks like an ugly mess (which really sucks, because i'm super excited about getting a new Nokia flagship) :(

Onerunjunior says:

The camera sticking out like that is an immediate turn-off. I don't want a wobbly phone, and I don't want a protrusion when one isn't needed. Make it a fraction of an inch thicker and make the back a uniform shape. 

Harry Wild says:

Do not like the back where the camera has a bluge in the housing.  It looks quite ugly and will get in the way when you carry it in your pocket or place on the surface. 

If this is the real deal I want to cry.

LinkArt says:

I do believe it's fake. If it was just tmobile exclusive than I'd think otherwise (hint the uncreative design of NL810).
Catwalk will be available worldwide with aluminum body, but I question this hump if the camera stays the same as NL920

anseld1986 says:

Honestly, I'd rather have built-in wireless charging. I prefer not putting a case of any kind on my phone, so the 920's integrated design is way more appealing to me as compared to the external case that the "three dots"-design of the 720 requires.

MorganRW says:

I agree. Why bother with an aluminum skin if it's going to be covered with a charging plate? I sincerely hope this is a bad photoshop job.

o4komodo says:

It would make no sense for Nokia to put the USB port on top...
Otherwise their wireless QI car dock would lose some of it's 'features'

MorganRW says:

Not to mention that it makes using the device while plugged in a pain in the ass as the cable weight keeps tugging the top of the device down. They really nailed everything with the 920. I hope they don't fall backward with this terrible design.

Good Lord, that's uglee! With that crater on the back, it looks like it got shot at. What a looser design! Lumia is colour and style, with a Lumia, you can easily be seen in the sea of black/white iOSs and Androids.

Benz85 says:

This is a very very ugly phone, trust me no one will buy this one.

iamakii says:

Surely upgrade my 720 with this!

Something makes me think that its not only lighter but also Fragile. Hope they dont mess up with the handcrafted body including cheap chinese plastic like Samsung does with Galaxy

hipsterbot says:

I sure hope this isn't it. It's hideous, if this is real then it is like 5 steps back in design. 

I bet this is an HTC prototype.Actually I'm pretty sure of that.It has all the HTC design features: camera hump, the 3 dots (like the One X, not the 720), body looks like old HTC's...AND if you look closely, the Nokia logo is a bit offset.This is just some photoshop and a rumor.It will never make it as a Lumia, no matter what.

MorganRW says:

If this is the next version after the 920, I am very dissapointed. Why bother with an aluminum skin if you are going to cover it with a wireless charging plate? I love the fact that the flagship 920 has wireless charging built in. Also moving the charging port back to the top which is a total pain if you want to do anything with it while it is plugged in as the cable weight keeps tugging the top down. The camera hump will make lying it down on a flat surface and typing on it a rocking horse of impossible. Also note how the rim of the camera is already beat up. This is a major step backward in my opinion and I hope this is not true. The people complaining about weight are not the users of the 920. I honestly prefer the heft of this solid device as it makes the plastic and light phones from the other groups feel like flimsy toys. If this is the next device, I will plan on keeping my 920 for another year. Please Nokia. Please make the next phone after the 920 a step forward.

FletchyT says:

sorry, but that just looks ugly compaired to the 920

NATE072107 says:

wouldn't bumping the rumor to a 10 make it less true?

This doesn't look like the flagship phone for the Nokia Lumia line. It might be the 800+ edition because of 3 holes before the speakers which is meant for a possible "wireless charging shell" option. : )

TheAsad_1 says:

Hmmm, i dont mean to be rude, but the back does not look very attractive with the camera sticking out, just my opinion, anyone agree???