First renders of the reversible USB 3.1 cable released

First renders of the reversible USB 3.1 cable leak

We’ve become accustomed to knowing one end of a USB cable has to go into a computer or charger, and the other end goes into your phone, but there is a future where you can use either end in either thingie, and this is what that utopian paradise looks like. The USB Implementers Forum is showing off two USB 3.1 connector standards today.

Type-C shows off a design similar to the microUSB format we all know and love, except it’s the same at both ends, and there’s no set top or bottom for those plugs. This reversible tip is a feature Apple’s been getting an early lead with using their Lightning connector, though the more direct comparison would be Apple’s Thunderbolt. The Micro-B cable shows a slightly wider mobile connector we’ve already seen cropping up in devices like the Samsung Galaxy Note 3

Why do we need a new USB standard? Well, increased data speeds for one. We’re talking 10 Gbps, versus the 5 Gbps available on USB 3.0. Two, you can expect faster charging times. We’ll be getting between 3 A and 5 A of current, up from 1.5 A. All of these new USB plugs will be backwards compatible with the 3.0 products in market (with an adapter, maybe?), so no need to worry about things getting too wonky with your existing hardware. In any case, it’ll be cool to start seeing micro-sized plugs built into PCs and chargers.

USB 3.1 port render



There are 58 comments. Sign in to comment

astroXP says:

We’re talking 10 Gbps, versus the 5 Gbps available on USB 3.0.

Can I get a "seems faster"?

Mestiphal says:

Seems smaller..

sahib lopez says:

Seems quickly!!

godote says:

Seems salabim

nizzon says:

Lol. You win this rond.

Eas195 says:

dude, you win the Internet!

HaibaneReki says:

You asked nicely "seems-faster" ahead :)

mdram says:

feems saster?

eshy says:

These plugs combined with the EU standard for device charging cable could mean Apple will end up releasing devices with this plug instead of their lightning (although they would lose all that revenue they get from $30 cable that should cost $1-2)

Benny1434 says:

No chance they will give up that money.

Rubios says:

They will if they are told to do so.

The other option is losing access to the biggest market in the world.

Nimdock says:

Hahaha, good one. Of course they won't.

jlzimmerman says:

Apple fans should be furious that they went with this propietary lightning connector.  Completely asinine when the rest of the world uses mini and micro USB.

borasar says:

but it's revolutionary!!! 

Rubios says:

Lighting shits all over the current micro USB.

Deamion says:

But it's got what fanboyz crave! It's got electrolytes... /s

Agent-P says:

Apart from the fact lightning is proprietary, I actually prefer it to microUSB. It seems much more durable because it's one flat piece rather than a hollow shape. That isn't to say microUSB is fragile though. I bought an iPhone 5 and a Lumia 920 in 2012. I needed to replace the micro USB cable last month, but I'm still using the same lighting cable.

eshy says:

I agree that the lightning is a better connector, mostly because it's reversible. I bought several micro usb cables for very cheap, I was more concerned about losing cables (and having to unplug the one $30 cable and take it with me). IMO cheap cables beat a sturdy expensive cable and now that USB cables will be reversible (and have the same tips on both ends) it will be even better

peterfares says:

The flat shape of the lightning connector isn't so great. I've seen MANY lightning cables where the pins are somehow damaged due to being exposd. 

ymcpa says:

but replacing the USB cable cost you $1-$2. You can replace 15 usb cables before you reach the price of one lightning cable. Atually the old 30 pin cables from Apple seemed pretty fragile. I had to replace a few of those. My USB cables seem to last a few years.

Rubios says:

I (and the planet as a whole) prefer having one good cable than 15 shitty ones.

stephking92 says:

Nah, it's just you. Other people don't like paying for overpriced cable even if they're just a bit more sturdy comparably.

jjmurphy says:

They'll still sell tons.  Many many many people only buy "official" apple accessories.  Their bigger revenue loss will be that they won't have belkin, etc. licensing their technology for products.

Sin Ogaris says:

In Australia you can get lightning cables for 6 bucks, basically the exact same price as micro usb, just don't buy genuine.

Chris Yahya says:

Who need 10 Gbps , even people still thinking "5gbps is seems faster"? (pardon my eng)

John20212 says:

Thats the same uninteligent question that people say about USB 3, that is until they use it and then they will never again want to wait a 1min+ for something to copy.


Chris Yahya says:

Ha. Thats my point. Everyone in my country indonesia (or worldwide) always thinking : who need superspeed, if you just wait a minutes to copy, at least doesnt take long time."

Everyone in indonesia still using USB 2.0, and i asked why dont use USB 3.0? his answer : who need a superspeed, even usb 2.0 is so fast?

(pardon my eng again)

ymcpa says:

People who copy large files? When I go on vacation, I copy several movies to my tablet and even with the USB 3.0 it takes some time to transfer the files.

Micropel says:

I have 144 gigs in my phone i load movies and music so much faster if I had the 10gbps

Deaconclgi says:

The Lightning port is my favorite part about my iPhone 5s. I was honestly thinking about the sheer convenience of not having to worry about a top or bottom for the connector.

Working in IT, you would be surprised at the amount of reports that we get from people who can't get their usb devices to simply plug in and say "it doesn't plug into the computer anywhere! I have tried everything!"

borasar says:

wireless charging>lightning port

Rubios says:

Yeah, because Windows Phone 8 has great wireless sync software.

Oh wait...

stephking92 says:

Why are you trolling in this article in anyway? Go hate on WP on other OS related websites.

theflew says:

These people should be given a pad and pencil to work with. If they can't figure out up and down maybe a PC is little over their heads.

nizzon says:

First they should be given a high five... with a chair... in their face.

Why wasn't the USB made to be reversible in the first place??

edtrunks says:

Because hindsight is always 20/20

Tempest790 says:

More like hindsight is 50/50.  50% chance you'll plug it in wrong.

elderjlward says:

Maybe because larger devices like PCs preceeded the advent of the revolutionized consumer smartphone market around 2007. The PCs and laptops OEMs had already manufactured and designed and were designing had a USB port that accommodated the size of the device. With smartphones tremoondous growth in the market, they of course needed ports that would connect them to devices/power units, but naturally the standard USB port on a PC was far too large for a smartphone to accommodate. Thus the mini/micro USB port on smartphones. This of course necessitated cables with one end that would fit PC/laptops which were already well founded in the market , and now these relatively new, much smaller devices, that were new to the market- thus cables with different ends.
Now that we are years down the road and smartphone/mobile (tablets too) market is well established and the advent of a cable with the same ends is now timely. Just my guess as to why we didn't see this in the beginning.

peterfares says:

He's not talking about host and slave side plugs, he's talking about up and down on the plugs being reversible. 

simphf says:

Because engineers will never truly understand how uncompromising incompetent the human race is.

Rubios says:

They are bad engineers then.

3.1 should devices should be backwards compatible with 2.0 cables. As long we don't drop copper wire.

ncxcstud says:

I'm more intrigued by the faster charging capabilities. Not that it takes too terribly long to charge my 920 now, but to think that it could get faster? That's awesome.

stephking92 says:

I think it would be most relevant on tablets where they have very large batteries that presently require a long time to charge. This technology together with technologies like the Snapdragon 800's fast charging will reduce charging time significantly.

Rockartisten says:

"Artist rendering"

So this isn't official? If so, what's the point of this article?

peterfares says:

Well there are no laptops with said ports yet so they have to make a rendering. It just shows what they're thinking it will look like. Hasn't it already been confirmed that USB 3.1 will be reversible? I just didn't know that the cables will also no longer have directions either. 

zlos7ar says:

We are talking tinner surface pro 3 here guys !!! Can't wait

Jack Larson1 says:

I'd take a full USB for my phone port if possible

chrispyogurt says:

I taught slower charging is better for battery life as phone doesn't heat up like lava.

We needed a rendering to imagine what this is gonna look like? :)

twelvetudors says:

So if it's the same on both ends, are we going to need another port to plug it into computers? An adapter? Neither of those sound like good options for current products.

vkvraju says:

I think this (reversible) design is long overdue.

Ixolite says:

Not a fan of those slim and small plugs, especially when the cable moves a lot, like with headphones for example. Easier to break.

brunoland says:

Apple's thunderbolt???? You mean Intel's thunderbolt?