Microsoft News

Microsoft 'betrayed' Finland, says Finnish finance minister of layoffs


Microsoft's aiming for flagship Windows Phones, killing Nokia X but selling MixRadio


New Treasure Tag app update ditches the 'Nokia' brand

Microsoft News

Rumor claims 1,000 former Nokia employees in Finland could be laid off by Microsoft


New Nokia MixRadio update ditches the 'Nokia' brand

Windows Phones

Lumia 930 pre-orders begin in Norway Wednesday for July 10 launch

Windows Phones

Microsoft Store US site pulls pre-order listings for Nokia Lumia 635


Nokia Imaging SDK 1.2 released, Lumia SensorCore SDK out of private beta

Windows Phones

Nokia Lumia 635 for AT&T and T-Mobile available for pre-order at US Microsoft Store site

General News

Microsoft teases possible launch date of a green Lumia or successor to the X

General News

Microsoft partners with British designer to create wireless charging pants

Microsoft News

Beat Nokia by predicting world cup games in Sporting Mouth to win some awesome prizes

General News

Lumia 930 availability on Ireland's Meteor pushed back to mid-July

Microsoft News

Nokia brand names Lumia, ClearBlack, PureView, and others now belong to Microsoft

General News

Lumia 1320, 630 availability expand to Argos Ireland

General News

Nokia Ireland confirms Lumia 930 launch on July 3

Windows Phones

Nokia Lumia 635 going on sale in Singapore on Saturday


Nokia updates Network+ again

General News

Nokia buying Medio Systems to improve its HERE maps service

Windows Phone News

Nokia Lumia 930 confirmed to be coming soon to Ireland on Meteor


Investors sue Nokia for fraud surrounding the Lumia 900 and Windows Phone

Nokia sued by investor

While Nokia has filed a patent lawsuit against HTC and RIM, the Finnish company is now on the receiving end of litigation. Robert Chmielinski, a Nokia investor, has filed a class action suit in U.S. Federal Court claiming Nokia made false and misleading comments on its Windows Phones and how the new phones would effect the company's position in the market.

The complaint was filed in the Southern District of New York and cites several statements from Nokia's CEO Stephen Elop where he spoke of the company's plans for success with the Lumia Windows Phones.  The claim also cites industry experts who claimed Nokia had all the right tools to win the smartphone game.  Chmielinski sees these as false statements and fraud because Nokia's market shares have declined and the Lumia 900 had a software glitch which resulted in $100 credit to customers, making the Lumia 900 basically a free phone for most consumers.

"Defendant's statements set forth above were materially false and misleading because Nokia's migration to a Windows platform was not going as well as represented. The Lumia 900 had a glitch which forced Nokia to offer a $100 credit and earlier Lumia offerings were not as well accepted as represented"

Chmielinski feels that due to this fraud, he and the class suffered economic loss that could have been avoided. While the complaint doesn't place a dollar amount, the plaintiffs are asking for damages, interest and costs from Nokia as well as equitable, injunctive or other relief the Court may deem just.

Nokia has issued a very brief response to the litigation saying,

"Nokia is reviewing the allegations contained in the complaint and believes that they are without merit. Nokia will defend itself against the complaint."

So, what do you think? Did Nokia overstep it's bounds and falsely predict the Lumia's success? Or did Nokia simply have a positive outlook and investors knew the risks? Does the term caveat emptor come to mind?

You can find the full complaint against Nokia here.

Source: PCMag; Thanks, Andrew, for the tip!



There are 79 comments. Sign in to comment

mjrtoo says:

Some real powerful people want WP to fail...

Quin 2013 says:

Exactly. I wouldn't be surprised if they had people invest and hoped for failure so they can do what this guy is doing.

skywalker#WP says:

People need to give Nokia a break. It was and is still impossible for Nokia to become no. 1 smartphone seller overnight, even with the Lumia 900. Patience is called for here just as I'm patiently waiting for the Lumia 900 to go on sale in Germany so I can get myself one.

Judge_Daniel says:

Talk about kicking someone while they're down...

gmantione says:

Was gonna say EXACTLY that haha

ShortStuff says:

I'm sure the investors knew the risk they were taking even I a common American citizen knew the risk. You simply cant pretext the future duh! Even if all the stars do align in the right place things could quickly change sheesh. They need to stop complaining unless Nokia told them it was 100% for sure -_-

selfcreation says:

even if nokia promises 100% its an investment and RULE #1 of investing is .. NOTHING is guarantied….

 lol this int gona make it to the end .

SocalBrian says:

If Nokia had promised 100% this would be an open and shut case (and Nokia would loose). Investors use guidance from companies when evaluating investments and companies are held to a higher standard about that guidance.

bobsentell says:

This one should last all of five minutes in court.  Nokia has the vagueness of their statements to back them up. "We said it would be a successful move. We didn't say what that level of success would be or when it would happen."

He wanted Elop to say Lumia was going to fail and people shouldn't invest in Nokia. Ffs... Smells like shady business..

CJ Thunder says:

Knew not new...

Anyway, this is ridiculous. No returns are guaranteed as an investor and its only been a month.

funkyGeneral says:

The credit makes the phone free on a three year contract. I am pretty sure that doesn't mean a Total loss on the phone.

Jeli#IM says:

Might want to wait for the quarterly results post sale of the Lumia 900 even with the $100 credit. They still made profit through carrier subsidies and plenty of people who bought it off contract. My local AT&T store can't even keep it in inventory.

Icthiodrak says:

All Nokia would have to do is show this article and the case would be dismissed:
It shows that even before they announced the switch to Windows Phone that Symbian was tanking fast.  Once they released the Lumia line it halted the free fall.  That alone is proof that they had to do something drastic otherwise they would be in a worse spot and it shows that the new strategy is helping.

Not only that, but recent comments by Jorma Ollila to, and the comments by Lee Williams (formerly of the Symbian Foundation) to CNETUK, confirms when Symbian's decline started and that Symbian was tanking fast.  The Lumia line is the rudder, and has changed course for Nokia, but it is simply going to take more than 7 months for this ship to steady itself.
Shareholders/Investors know that investing is risky.  Stephen Elop never promised them a time frame/or exact point in time on when the upswing in Lumia sales would be sustained, only that Lumia sales would increase over time and be distributed in more markets; and sales have increased and will continue to do so especially if they deploy devices faster and to more markets.
I hope the courts finding is that this lawsuit has zero merit, and throw it out!

erzhik says:

Another lawsuit troll. Pretty sure this investor has been an investor for a few months.

Baka says:

three words: "business judgment rule." this case is not going past summary judgment. The lawyer who filed it should be embarrassed and subject to 12b6 sanctions for bringing a frivolous suit.

jkercado says:

For a moment I read "12d6" sanctions...That would be a lot of sanctions! /d&dGeek

dkp23 says:

This going no where. He probably paid $10 a share. Haha.

brorim says:

Wtf kinda shit story is this ??

mdrapps says:

Cry baby.  The guy has no idea how to invest.  It called taking chances.  Nokia made the changes they said they were going to do, and they are supporting their products and decisions very well.   The only valid law suit would be if they did not move to Windows Phone and did not follow their plan.

OMG55 says:

This guy is trying to get some of the marketing money ms gave Nokia & Samsung to advertise.....ive not seen any good advertising here in the US. If it's not selling well, its because of this fact. I am more than happy with my white L900

TheDarKnight says:

I think Nokia totally deserves it, I exchanged 6 Lumia’s in 3 days, I went thought hell and most of the time they refused to exchange, even contacted Nokia they said it’s not our problem check with ATT.

pdubb#WP says:

I was expecting some sort of corroboration. It just seems like you had a insane amount of bad luck. It also seemed that you were saying that reviews for the phone were false. Could your review be false? Did you really go through all that with the Lumia? I have heard of a few problems but none as bad as yours. I hope you did get a chance to get the phones you and your fiancee wanted. Good luck out there!

mythos13 says:

Ridiculous, there was nothing beyond measured confidence that just about every CEO shows. Nokia should sue this turd to recover the legal fees.

spaulagain says:

Wow, Investors are getting desperate these days. Hey, guess what, part of being an investor is taking risks. Not all things pan out as planned. Nokia in no way that I have seen presented false claims or attempted to mislead their investors. Its just the name of the game. Anyways, its only a couple months after the release of the Lumia 900 in the US, its doing pretty well and things like this may take time.
That investor needs to have a hard dose of reality shoved down his throat.

Mystictrust says:

The phone may have been "essentially free" to customers, but carriers paid Nokia up front for the phone before the customer even got there. Device subsidies and all that.
I don't understand... is this dude trying to imply that Nokia made no money due to their software glitch?

OMG55 says:

If they paid Nokia upfront, they sure don't act like it, with one measley commercial (ATT). How can you really sell something without adequate advertisement and unwilling store employees???

Duffau says:

I can after with the unwilling employees to an extent (it is getting better), but advertising has been growing. I've seem many lumia commercials

Duffau says:

After = agree

alex6272 says:

Give Nokia till the end of the year before deeming the conversion to WP a success or failure.

dbgman says:

This is like suing Las Vegas for loosing!
Investments are a gamble and they need to be able to ride out the valleys to come out positive in the end.
The phone was free to customers but ATT still paid something for them. They give the breaks on the phones to tie you into another two year contract. That is where they make the big bucks.
I noticed there is another similar one going around today about Yahoo.
Everyone knows that stock market is a rich man's vegas!

Biased123 says:

So your saying I can sue companies who's stock foes not perform well... Yeah, that will work... In that case I think Half the people on the planet could sue half the companies. Great day for lawyers!

blackprince says:

I was going to come and comment on this story but everyone else has pretty much taken the words right out of mouth (hands?).

gmantione says:

Hands indeed haha

ShahinTr says:

Haha. Hands. =D

WhoRUx3 says:

This is totally ridiculous. I think Windows phones and Nokia have a great product, future planning and the community to be successful. We have just started and we are not going to stop. I have used all three OS's and so far Windows has impressed me the most. They are all great, but Microsoft's own has captivated me the most. Lets ditch this guy out.

Jazmac says:

Frivolous as hell. Elop was supposed to consult with the Physic Hotline before making a move? This will be successful.

cool8man says:

The thing that makes this really silly is that the Lumia 900 is the second best selling phone at AT&T after the iPhone.
Not that the suit would have had any merit if it had been about moving to Windows Phone in general, but the fact that he's suing Nokia over their biggest success in the U.S. in almost a decade just makes this all the more ridiculous. If Nokia has done one thing right in the past year it is the Lumia 900 on AT&T.

12Danny123 says:

I agree even Nokia can prove easily that the Nokia lumia 900 release was a complete success. By the amazon sales and by AT&T. Ut's to early to know how much were sold. But this person is suing them when they didn't even release numbers. Bet this would be a apple or a android fanboy

ejb222 says:

"MOMMY! Elop told me we was gonna make some money and things were good...but it didn't happen...WAH WAH WAH!"
This stuff ticks me off so much!

JasonG83 says:

And this is why we need the British system, where losers pay the winners' legal fees.

jsnod25 says:

Same happens in the US bro...

gmantione says:

What we really need is the everywhere-else-in-the-world-but-America-system, where everyone isn't suing everyone over malarkey like this. There ought to be written laws about bogus lawsuit trolls like this Scheissekopf.

TPM50 says:

What a load of shit.

soulzero says:

This guy is a filthy Worm.  

Umm ok, but what exactly did Apple do with iP4's death grip? They made a new iPhone and added S on it. At least the lumia 900 only had software problem and was easily fixable, and it was only on some handsets, not all.

beefydragon says:

So they just screwed the rest of the stock holders who didn't file for the class action nor within that range of period.  Does this mean we can have another class action suiting "them" for screwing us over?

Evster88 says:

Seriously. I own stock in Nokia and I think this guy is a fucking moron.

oldpueblo says:

I wasn't aware success depended on the launch day and the few days shortly after.  I know plenty of people that went to see a movie opening night and thought it was total shit, but all that gets reported is "how many went".  Whether or not the Lumia 900 makes a difference takes some time to gauge.  Not everyone is contract free and even aware of the 900 on the day it launches.  Give it a quarter or two.

jsantana0793 says:

I had to comment on this one.. Robert Chmielinski should have known the risks. First of all, the flagship phone just came our recently. Its out in a crowded, saturated, iPhone and Android market.. If you bet on Nokia and things didn't pan out, then that's the risk you take. If you were in a casino and you lost all your money at the poker table, you don't go after the Casino. This is going to go no where.. Nokia needs to have a positive out look, its going to take time for Windows Phone to take off in the US.. The states are full of iPhone and Android owners who have invested in their phones.. Unless Microsoft comes up with a whole new innovated phone need seen before and come up with a blow your mind ad. Microsoft will have a long way to climb.

s2korpio says:

I sense a sore loser right here, not an investor.

pulkit10 says:

Still don't see the point behind this, he is basically upset because Nokia lost marketshare? and he is saying that is unacceptable and misleading because Nokia claimed its new Windows Phone backed line up would be successful? Well, here's some news, Lumias have been selling well overall and the loss of Marketshare is inevitable as people phase out those old Symbian running smartphones. While not exactly the best spot for Nokia to be in right now - it is completely understandable. Absolutely idiotic to invest in a company that WILL continue to lose marketshare, for the aformentioned reasons, and then sue them claiming that they mislead you by saying that a newly launched line up will do well. 
As for the $100 credit - that's great. People who haven't been completely satisfied with the 900 have been giving Nokia great reviews just because of this. It's really a gesture of goodwill at the cost of a short term loss - makes business sense to me. Certainly more acceptable than pretending the issue doesn't exist and then sending out free $2 bumpers to make up for it. And furthermore, the issue has been fixed and the credit is no longer applicable so why the hissy fit? Is his life really that empty or he is just too dam lazy to find a real way to earn money?

iamoniwaban says:

People like this who are ruining the world of technology.

IamNabil says:

It bothers me that Nokia did the right thing by their customers (the credit) and is being sued by an investor. Makes me wish I had bought stock so I could justifiably defame the plaintiff.

Wacft says:

I think you all are crazy. Every Nokia phone has been lackluster at best. Operation rolling thunder should have been operation rolling trickle. The plethora of devices when they hit the US never happened and I still havent seen Nokia commercials that weren't online or for another country. The 900 is beautiful but they should have made all the big promises for Apollo and now they are feeling the backlash. I hope the best for them.

blackprince says:

I think you haven't been paying attention. Even up here in Canada we have seen all the Nokia and AT&T commercials.

gmantione says:

...seriously? Kick em some more while they're down...

Falven says:

Something people don't realize is that the smartphone market takes time to grow... What I mean by this is that people are bound by two year contracts to their phones, and no matter how bad I want the Lumia 900 I have tow ait until my current contract is over. I'm sure there are many others in my situation. Measuring the growth of a smartphone's business can't be apropriately done in such a small timeframe... what has it been like a  week since the 900 came out?

IceDree says:

What where they expecting ? an iPhone level success outta the batt ?

It took Apple a 59 days to sell a Million iPhone (the 1st gen.) which everyone said its a failure & look at the iPhone now , Its the best selling phone of all times

It also took Motorola 74 days to sell a Million OG DROID

What were they expecting ? a Million units in two weeks ?

jdep1 says:

Everyone knows there is a risk in investments. No win for him. As far as the Nokia, at&t & wp7 I really thought I would see more advertisement. I rearly see commercials on tv.

poddie says:

Profit does not come without risk. This guy is a first class idiot.

Dorknight says:

They're on their way to number 1. They're recovering still. They said that before for Gods sake

Evster88 says:

What idiots. Why would you ever sue the company you own shares of? It's ludicrous.
If you won't go long, then back out. You made a poor short term investment decision, get over it.

jwzg says:

If I were a lawyer, I'd take this one for Nokia, pro-bono. What an a$$.

eastbayrae says:

People are so litigeous in our country. The Plaintiff's should be sued for human idiocy.

RepoUK says:

What a jerk. Everyone knows that
Investing = taking a risk
Marketing = bullshit

r3ddawn74 says:

it's a class action suit lame brains, he isn't the only investor in the lawsuit, many investors are on the suit feeling the company mislead them. As shareholders, THEY have much more info on the company, then anyone here, so we'll see what the courts do with it and the information they submit. 

laserfloyd says:

Everyone these days wants instant gratification with guaranteed results. Symbian was in decline anyway. Android wouldn't have netted them anything since they were losing money anyway. Google wouldn't have supported them like MS has. So the guy is a baby with unrealistic views of the world. I weep for this generation. ;)

aeronaught says:

I've seen plenty of commercials for the Lumia 900, both on the internet and tv. You guys are probably just looking at the wrong shows, they're targeting the Dancing with the Stars and Glee crowd which have the main buying power (parents of tweens, young adults).

willied says:

I've seen plenty of commercials as well. I've even seen the Lumia 900 in multiple magazines.