Microsoft News

Microsoft 'betrayed' Finland, says Finnish finance minister of layoffs

Rumors

Microsoft's aiming for flagship Windows Phones, killing Nokia X but selling MixRadio

Apps

New Treasure Tag app update ditches the 'Nokia' brand

Microsoft News

Rumor claims 1,000 former Nokia employees in Finland could be laid off by Microsoft

Rumors

Is Microsoft readying a Lumia device that runs Android?

Apps

New Nokia MixRadio update ditches the 'Nokia' brand

Rumors

Microsoft rumored to be licensing Nokia's brand name for phones

Windows Phones

Lumia 930 pre-orders begin in Norway Wednesday for July 10 launch

Windows Phones

Microsoft Store US site pulls pre-order listings for Nokia Lumia 635

Apps

Nokia Imaging SDK 1.2 released, Lumia SensorCore SDK out of private beta

Windows Phones

Nokia Lumia 635 for AT&T and T-Mobile available for pre-order at US Microsoft Store site

General News

Microsoft teases possible launch date of a green Lumia or successor to the X

General News

Microsoft partners with British designer to create wireless charging pants

Microsoft News

Beat Nokia by predicting world cup games in Sporting Mouth to win some awesome prizes

General News

Lumia 930 availability on Ireland's Meteor pushed back to mid-July

Microsoft News

Nokia brand names Lumia, ClearBlack, PureView, and others now belong to Microsoft

General News

Lumia 1320, 630 availability expand to Argos Ireland

General News

Nokia Ireland confirms Lumia 930 launch on July 3

Windows Phones

Nokia Lumia 635 going on sale in Singapore on Saturday

Microsoft News

Chris Weber on the future of device branding at Microsoft

68

Nokia Lumia Windows Phones, no carrier logos allowed?

No carrier logos on the Lumia Windows Phones?

Interesting news coming out of Italy concerning the Nokia Lumia 920 and 820 Windows Phones. Internal sources are reporting that carriers will not be able to brand either of these phones with their corporate logo. The only logo allowed will be Nokia's.

Rum: 5

Italian carriers Telecom Italy, 3 Italy, Vodafone and Wind are all preparing to offer the Nokia Windows Phones but without their company logos. Carriers will be able to brand the Lumia Windows Phone through customized software such as AT&T's software suite or a custom hub.  A virtual branding of sorts.

With carrier influence being a little more passive overseas than here in the States, we could see this going either way.  While there was no indication if this restriction will extend to the U.S. carriers do you think we could see an AT&T Lumia 920 or T-Mobile Lumia 820 without any carrier logos this Fall?  If so, is that such a bad thing?

Source: Windows Phone Italy via: wmpoweruser

2
loading...
33
loading...
19
loading...
0
loading...

Comments

There are 68 comments. Sign in to comment

eastbayrae says:

Good. The logos ruin the look. I am not giving them free advertising.

cool8man says:

The AT&T logo on the Lumia 900 doesn't bother me at all. It's very small and discrete. The Verizon 4G LTE logo on the HTC 8X is another matter.

inteller says:

The upside of a broken screen is that the replacement screen doesn't have a logo on it.

jaethos says:

Yeah, but from the pics it looks like it's limited to the back. I much prefer that, even if the logo ends up bigger on the back, it's not something I'll be looking at all the time like the screen. Plus it's down at the bottom part of the phone where your hand will covering it most of the time anyway.

MAERSK says:

That and those horrible boxes the carriers supply. WTF was up with that tasteless Lumia 900 box? Ugh...

Kormiko says:

Yeah, I hate AT&T's orange and white boxes.  I know it's just a box that you're gonna look at for a day or two, but I don't understand why they think their boxes look nice.

As far as the logo goes, I don't realy mind it on my Focus, but it would be better if it weren't there at all.

jbrandonf says:

As an old at&t employee the only OEMs that can change at&t's boxes are iPhone, Samsung, and for some reason BlackBerry.

Z10YkakPES says:

As less crap on my Lumia 920 as possible please.

Auric Jarrel says:

Boy, I sure hope this is true.

MrVol84 says:

This is great news! i hate those carrier logos..

DallasFann says:

Great. That means no more accessories like my screen protector that has the cutout for the ATT logo but not Nokia. It is completly blocked out.

futurix says:

It had cutout for the logo?? What's the point?

SleepyTheDon says:

Big fan of NO BRANDING!!!
I hope same rules apply here in the U.S.

prowade says:

I would love this.

Big Supes says:

A great move. No one wants a crappy carrier logo on their device.

lippidp says:

I don't care one way or the other.

jerrynomenon says:

Might be for me too b/c I think I will buy unlocked one...

pr0phecy says:

Good. Hate branding.

ejlee072006 says:

I think all the phones available in the market should be logo less.. I think att is not that bad..verizon,sprint ugly

eastdockeryf says:

If there won't be an AT&T logo on the windows phone, then the Raiders will win the Super Bowl

Piro.Garay says:

Ok, so no logo, I get that... But are we going to have software or OS branding like you said? I'd rather have it ON the phone instead of IN the phone.

inteller says:

you can uninstall all of the ATT crap.  only thing you cant get out of it is the stupid "shim" they put on the internet sharing button that says "call ATT"  which is dumb when you don't have service with them.

stephen_az says:

If anyone thinks this will happen in the US, I have  bridge you might be interested in buying.  Last I checked, the only company Verizon has ever excempted from branding is Apple.  I dont even know if that is true since I don't own an iPhone.  Does anyone really think Nokia has the pull to get Verizon to back down or its policy, or that Microsoft would let them try given they want to get the phone on as many carriers as possible? If the biggest carrier will require branding, it is almost a certainty that the others will as well. 

jerrynomenon says:

Apple does not allow single carrier customizing for their iPhone

jimski says:

If the innards of a phone will only work on a single carrier (like Verizon possibly) then branding would not be out of the question. But if a phone is identical for multiple carriers, except for the ROM that get's flashed onto it, then the branding does not need to be there. Makes things much easier along the supply chain.
Pick a pallet of generic Lumia's out of the rack, flash them and drop in Vodaphone cartons, for example. Lot easier than forecasting for 50 or 100 different logoed phone screens.

More importantly, continue to make sure that whatever crapware the carriers put on the phone can be easily erased.  
As ugly and self-serving as carrier logos are, I would much rather have a carrier logo than some crapware that I can't remove.
My gf's old Blackberry Pearl was rendered useless after just over a year because of a combination of RIM being cheap with ram and Telus putting tons of apps that used up whatever ram was left after a BB OS update.  Those Telus apps were impossible to remove - worse than a virus!

myrandex says:

This has always been a big plus for windows phone. No crapware baked in!

jdep1 says:

+1 first thing I would do on my Android devices would be to turn S off & rooted because I hated all the crap my carrier would bake in to it. Android phones are so bloated

Coan says:

I'm hoping this applies here too, my Focus is missing Rogers labeling (well, I'm not really missing it). I don't know if it was a side effect of being an early adopter or if they just didn't bother with branding the devices.

Aldoron says:

I don't think they bothered. It seems like they 'ignored' the phones they were unsure of.. I for one enjoy the unbranded phone

Lasp24 says:

I with with Nokia. If you take time to make an amazing looking phone, you don't want anything to ruin or even come in the way...

DavidinCT says:

I hope Verizon does not have an issue with this.... I want my Lumia 920 in White please !!!
 
I did double check, My wife's iPhony 4 does not have a Verizon logo, so I guess it's not off the limits of things.... I hope..(my wife's best friend has a iPhone, yea, I tried)

Iconoclysm says:

Apple also does not include their own logo on the front of the phone - I hope that's where Nokia is heading with this.  I do not need to know who my carrier is or who made my phone when I look at my screen, and nobody can see it when it's up to my ear.  It's a horrible practice that I hope all companies just stop doing.

If I had to choose between the two I'd rather have a carrier tramp stamp on my device. Bloatware is the devil.

Bullshit can't happen

cannon#WP says:

I would love this, but this would NEVER EVER happen in the US. The only way I can see this happening is if AT&T or Verizon carries 2 SKUs and charge $50 more for the non-branded version.

Iconoclysm says:

Apple managed to do it for the past 5 years...definitely not impossible.

220SeaChaser says:

I don't like the logo

Luminatic says:

I was always wondering about that branding business .. to be honest, I wouldn't want a Swisscom logo on my phone! Thanks god branding doesn't take place where I live. And the extra provider software can be easily removed.

erix_2pac says:

Hope this is true. Coz i like this.

bobsentell says:

I put a case over it anyway so I don't really care.

el-ojo says:

I'm sure there will be carrier branding. Or else why would they put it on their network. It's not Apple, it's a third place platform. I don't care though. AT&T sponsors a lot of the stuff I like to watch, so I'm happy to return the favor :-)

LCARS says:

If this is true, Nokia is my hero. I don't want crap on my phone or in it.

hasasimo says:

Wishful thinking and not gonna happen. The phones are actually designed to accept carrier logos, that's why the Nokia logo is off to the side (so the carrier logo can go on the other side). Nokia, always, always puts their logo in the middle on their unlocked and non-carrier branded phones. See the Lumia 900 U.S. version compared to the international unlocked one as the latest example. 

Iconoclysm says:

Yeah, something that has always happened can never possibly change...especially when your biggest competitor already does it.

rocky 710 says:

good move by nokia 
 

stoickiwi says:

Hopefully this is the case, seeing as I work for Sprint I don't particularly want an AT&T logo on my phone :P

Sure hope so. I already like that the only branding on my DVP is "Dell" and "Windows Phone."

I'd like to stick to that manner if simplicity.

KFBradley says:

Here in Canada, Rogers doesn't brand their phones. My 900 is unbranded and I prefer it that way.

jandieg.b says:

Nokia setting the rulez

di_Genius says:

+1 I think it should be implemented here too good idea, cause if u plan to use a prepaid sim won't have any logo on your phone.

If this is true, I like Nokia's style.

Cristoby says:

An AT&T logo, with a led light right in the little globe, just to show who's the boss.

soulzero says:

Why not, Apple dont allow AT&T to Muck up the iPhone...

MaulerX says:

I hope this is true. If Apple can do it then why not Nokia? It's great because it shows that Nokia has some leverage this time around. They deserve to succeed.

simmomelb says:

Carrier logos are awful, I would never buy a phone with this logo slapped on it.

powellce says:

No car dealer tags on my car, and no carrier tags on my phone. Especially since AT&T has updated my Focus only once.

Is it just me or does the At&t logo on my 900 look really nice and it looks nicer than just Nokia?

irlju#WP says:

Nokia should have confidence in its design and keep its own logo to the back too.

XboxOmac says:

Great news! I hate branding.

jaysandal says:

Yes, I don't need ant att logo on my 920

wpeight says:

Just stick a black tape on the logo. :-D