Is this really a whole new Microsoft?
Comments
There are 28 comments. Sign in to commentlongcipher says:
It better be.
sanien says:
Excatly or I think that they will be left behind in the long run, but I think they know this now, hence they are building their own tablet and phone and spending a bunch of $$$ Personally I think that they will do just fine provided that they don't blow WP 8 and Windows 8.... if so it would be really really bad for them.
hwangeruk says:
There is nothing to worry about for MS.
The bit most people forget, is that Windows 8 is not Metro.
Its a clear direction, the big change, but underneath Windows 8 is more advanced than Windows 7. If Metro is so rejected (which I don't think it will) they could realse Windows 8.1 with Metro tomorrow and still have a better OS than Windows 7 and OSX :)
Enterprise is going from strength to strength. Due to Moores law, SQL can replace Oracle / DB2 and other big data installs from other companies for x86 money. Exchange is massive, and Office 365 is viable cloud option. Windows Server 2012 is awesome, and Hyper-V is catching up ESX - but why oh why do they persist with System Centre which is OVER ENGINEERED!
No really, MS can only lose out on Phone and Tablet markets by poor execution. But I've used an RT tablet and its actually pretty good. And I am here primarily as I am a Windows Phone user - and that also is a really fine phone OS. It will not go anywhere, and actually with the common core stands a good chance of being brilliant.
I certainly wouldn't lose sleep over Microsoft's health. Its such a resilient, broadly risked company with so many ingrained enterprise relationships and up against nothing on the PC side (OSX/Mac is twice the price, and Linux is no good for normal consumers) No, nothing to worry about at all.
blessthejon says:
Exactly what I was thinking longcipher!! The old Microsoft just started things and forgot about them.
chipstar5000 says:
I agree about Skype. As the country gets blanketed in Wifi, there will be even less of a reason to have anything but the absolute bare number of minutes for most users. Sorry, overpriced carriers.
ImmortalWarrior says:
Carriers and broadcast companies have been fighting the open internet for a decade now trying to prevent this. They won't openly admit it, but it is obvious. Anticompetitive behavior started with data caps. Then when companies like Rogers offer streaming to customers at no data charge (Rogers on Demand does not count towards your data use) while charging for data for other similar services (Netflix), then it went overboard.
If I could completely replace my cable with internet services I would, the problem is that I cannot get enough data. I'm looking into switching to Teksavvy as they still offer an unlimited internet plan once I get settled in my new job next week. I'll love it when I can give Rogers the big middle finger.
jcagga says:
Question, since Skype is now Microsoft, the public who bought Skype stocks prior to acquisition, are there stocks changed to Microsoft?
Coffee says:
Skype was privately held before the acquisition and never publicly traded.
rjohn05 says:
This is a new Microsoft for sure. But as far as Skype is concerned, they really should think about using it to bypass the carriers. Hopefully that is the future.
Munkeyphyst says:
Who would you buy your mobile data from?
JedH says:
Well you would need wifi for Skype, so if you had Skype running your data would be wifi as well.
Munkeyphyst says:
Skype runs on 4G. and if your not around a WiFi signal, you would have no calls out or in? You can do that now. Just buy the smallest package available and only use your phone when on wifi, but that won't remove the need for carriers.
Iconoclysm says:
MS has had the option to bypass the carriers with OCS and Lync for almost 6 years but haven't even included audio communications in those clients because they didn't want to compete with the carriers. It will surely be a new MS if they take on the carriers this way.
ThePKReddy says:
They should start providing mobile data services. I hate the carriers. They add zero value
based_graham says:
Yeah Microsoft isn't messing around anymore its a newer Microsoft different feel different direction I like it.
gwydionjhr says:
I'm surprised there is no comment on the Entertainment division's results. IIRC it saw an increase in business, and IIRC, the Entertainment division includes Windows Phone.
ChrisLynch says:
Well, with the $1.8B deferral, and the recent news of Intel and AMD losing value, I'd say it's inline with the entire industry. Is this entirely Microsoft's fault? No, but they have a huge stake in this, and I know that OEM's will come out swinging on the 26th. I for one am not panicking, and hope to see very good numbers in 2 quarters.
SoundWeb says:
Its WAAAYYY to early to think you'd see any changes due to W8/WP8/Surface. It hasn't even been released yet. And then it will take some time to gain traction. As an investor, I'm not looking to see positive movement until this time next year.
Neusyn says:
Second to last paragraph... Rofl
aimuatrang says:
@soundweb
That is kind of late isn't it? This time next year?
How about late winter or early spring 2013? It gives people some time to get accustomed to W8 format at work, home, school etc... Then they will recognize WP8 and buy them...
Cellus13 says:
They've been on a roll for the past years. With Windows phone 7-8. The amazing functional windows 8. The partnership with Nokia, the surface tablet. Microsoft has been killing it alot lately.
Bugbog says:
I personally think that, figures aside, this is a negatively biased article.
lilmoe2002 says:
Stock prices aren't always good indicators of a company's performance. Just saying....
DavidinCT says:
Hmmm...
Steve Jobs = Apple
Bill Gates = Microsoft
In my eyes, not good over the long term...
stmav says:
Just what isn't good about it?






























